Arid
DOI10.1071/WR15082
Delimiting road-effect zones for threatened species: implications for mitigation fencing
Peaden, J. Mark1; Tuberville, Tracey D.2; Buhlmann, Kurt A.2; Nafus, Melia G.1,3; Todd, Brian D.1
通讯作者Todd, Brian D.
来源期刊WILDLIFE RESEARCH
ISSN1035-3712
EISSN1448-5494
出版年2015
卷号42期号:8页码:650-659
英文摘要

Context. Roads are a pernicious form of habitat loss for many wildlife populations because their effects often extend far beyond the roads themselves, giving rise to reduced wildlife abundance in road-effect zones. Quantifying the extent of road-effect zones more accurately portrays their impact on populations and the true extent to which habitat is lost for many species.


Aim. The purpose of the present study was to evaluate ways of determining the extent of road-effect zones for a model study species to better quantify the effect of roads on habitat loss.


Methods. We conducted road-side surveys for signs of Mojave desert tortoises (Gopherus agassizii) 0, 200, 400, 800 and 1600m from county roads and interstates, two of the most common road types in critical habitat of this threatened species. Using data from these road-side surveys, we estimated the extent of road-effect zones using piecewise regression and modified von Bertalanffy models.


Key results. We found reduced abundances of tortoise sign along both county roads and interstates. Reductions extended farther from the large, high-traffic interstate than from the smaller, lower-traffic county roads (306m versus 230 m). The increase in the abundance of tortoise signs with distance from roads approximated a negative exponential curve.


Conclusions. Interstate and county roads both contribute to habitat loss in road-side areas by making these habitats unsuitable to desert tortoises, presumably by removing animals via mortality from collisions with vehicles. Larger roads with greater traffic have more extensive effects.


Implications. Roadside mitigation fencing has been proposed as one way to reduce mortality of desert tortoises and to reclaim habitat by allowing tortoises to recolonise currently depauperate road-effect zones. Immediate mortality is more likely to be prevented by fencing county roads where tortoises occur closer to roads and are more likely to be struck by vehicles and killed. However, fencing interstate should yield more reclaimed habitat than that obtained from fencing county roads. Managers must consider balancing these goals along with other concerns when deciding where to place roadside fencing.


英文关键词conservation road ecology species recovery turtle
类型Article
语种英语
国家USA
收录类别SCI-E
WOS记录号WOS:000370968000004
WOS关键词TORTOISES GOPHERUS-AGASSIZII ; GRIZZLY BEARS ; UNITED-STATES ; HABITAT FRAGMENTATION ; TURTLE POPULATIONS ; HUMAN FOOTPRINT ; HOME-RANGE ; DESERT ; MOVEMENT ; BIODIVERSITY
WOS类目Ecology ; Zoology
WOS研究方向Environmental Sciences & Ecology ; Zoology
来源机构University of California, Davis
资源类型期刊论文
条目标识符http://119.78.100.177/qdio/handle/2XILL650/190834
作者单位1.Univ Calif Davis, Dept Wildlife Fish & Conservat Biol, One Shields Ave, Davis, CA 95616 USA;
2.Univ Georgia, Savannah River Ecol Lab, Aiken, SC 29802 USA;
3.San Diego Zoo Inst Conservat Res, Escondido, CA 92027 USA
推荐引用方式
GB/T 7714
Peaden, J. Mark,Tuberville, Tracey D.,Buhlmann, Kurt A.,et al. Delimiting road-effect zones for threatened species: implications for mitigation fencing[J]. University of California, Davis,2015,42(8):650-659.
APA Peaden, J. Mark,Tuberville, Tracey D.,Buhlmann, Kurt A.,Nafus, Melia G.,&Todd, Brian D..(2015).Delimiting road-effect zones for threatened species: implications for mitigation fencing.WILDLIFE RESEARCH,42(8),650-659.
MLA Peaden, J. Mark,et al."Delimiting road-effect zones for threatened species: implications for mitigation fencing".WILDLIFE RESEARCH 42.8(2015):650-659.
条目包含的文件
条目无相关文件。
个性服务
推荐该条目
保存到收藏夹
导出为Endnote文件
谷歌学术
谷歌学术中相似的文章
[Peaden, J. Mark]的文章
[Tuberville, Tracey D.]的文章
[Buhlmann, Kurt A.]的文章
百度学术
百度学术中相似的文章
[Peaden, J. Mark]的文章
[Tuberville, Tracey D.]的文章
[Buhlmann, Kurt A.]的文章
必应学术
必应学术中相似的文章
[Peaden, J. Mark]的文章
[Tuberville, Tracey D.]的文章
[Buhlmann, Kurt A.]的文章
相关权益政策
暂无数据
收藏/分享

除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。