Knowledge Resource Center for Ecological Environment in Arid Area
DOI | 10.5424/sjar/2015131-6323 |
Comparison among monitoring strategies to assess water flow dynamic and soil hydraulic properties in agricultural soils | |
Valdes-Abellan, Javier1; Jimenez-Martinez, Joaquin2; Candela, Lucila3; Tamoh, Karim3 | |
通讯作者 | Valdes-Abellan, Javier |
来源期刊 | SPANISH JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH
![]() |
ISSN | 1695-971X |
出版年 | 2015 |
卷号 | 13期号:1 |
英文摘要 | Irrigated agriculture is usually performed in semi-arid regions despite scarcity of water resources. Therefore, optimal irrigation management by monitoring the soil is essential, and assessing soil hydraulic properties and water flow dynamics is presented as a first measure. For this purpose, the control of volumetric water content, theta, and pressure head, h, is required. This study adopted two types of monitoring strategies in the same experimental plot to control theta and h in the vadose zone: i) non-automatic and more time-consuming; ii) automatic connected to a datalogger. Water flux was modelled with Hydrus-1D using the data collected from both acquisition strategies independently (3820 daily values for the automatic; less than 1000 for the non-automatic). Goodness-of-fit results reported a better adjustment in case of automatic sensors. Both model outputs adequately predicted the general trend of 0 and h, but with slight differences in computed annual drainage (711 mm and 774 mm). Soil hydraulic properties were inversely estimated from both data acquisition systems. Major differences were obtained in the saturated volumetric water content, theta(s), and the n and alpha van Genuchten model shape parameters. Saturated hydraulic conductivity, K-s, shown lower variability with a coefficient of variation range from 0.13 to 0.24 for the soil layers defined. Soil hydraulic properties were better assessed through automatic data acquisition as data variability was lower and accuracy was higher. |
英文关键词 | water management Hydrus inverse approach water flux |
类型 | Article |
语种 | 英语 |
国家 | Spain ; France |
收录类别 | SCI-E |
WOS记录号 | WOS:000351337400022 |
WOS关键词 | POROUS-MEDIA ; IRRIGATION ; SENSORS ; SPAIN ; CONDUCTIVITY ; TRANSPORT ; IMPACT ; PERFORMANCE ; CALIBRATION ; SIMULATION |
WOS类目 | Agriculture, Multidisciplinary ; Soil Science |
WOS研究方向 | Agriculture |
资源类型 | 期刊论文 |
条目标识符 | http://119.78.100.177/qdio/handle/2XILL650/190541 |
作者单位 | 1.Univ Alicante, Dept Civil Engn, San Vicente Del Raspeig 03690, Alicante, Spain; 2.Univ Rennes 1, Geosci Rennes, UMR CNRS 6118, Rennes, France; 3.Tech Univ Catalonia UPC, Dept Geotech Engn & Geosci, Barcelona, Spain |
推荐引用方式 GB/T 7714 | Valdes-Abellan, Javier,Jimenez-Martinez, Joaquin,Candela, Lucila,et al. Comparison among monitoring strategies to assess water flow dynamic and soil hydraulic properties in agricultural soils[J],2015,13(1). |
APA | Valdes-Abellan, Javier,Jimenez-Martinez, Joaquin,Candela, Lucila,&Tamoh, Karim.(2015).Comparison among monitoring strategies to assess water flow dynamic and soil hydraulic properties in agricultural soils.SPANISH JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH,13(1). |
MLA | Valdes-Abellan, Javier,et al."Comparison among monitoring strategies to assess water flow dynamic and soil hydraulic properties in agricultural soils".SPANISH JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH 13.1(2015). |
条目包含的文件 | 条目无相关文件。 |
除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。