Arid
DOI10.5367/oa.2015.0209
Assessment of upgrading strategies to improve regional food systems in Tanzania Food processing, waste management and bioenergy, and income generation
Graef, F.1; Schneider, I.2; Fasse, A.4; Germer, J. U.5; Gevorgyan, E.6; Haule, F.7; Hoffmann, H.3; Kahimba, F. C.8; Kashaga, L.8; Kissoly, L.4; Lambert, C.9; Lana, M.2; Mahoo, H. F.8; Makoko, B.10; Mbaga, S. H.11; Mmbughu, A.7; Mkangwa, S.10; Mrosso, L.12; Mutabazi, K. D.13; Mwinuka, L.13,14; Ngazi, H.10; Nkonya, E.15; Said, S.12; Schaffert, A.5; Schaefer, M. P.16; Schindler, J.2; Sieber, S.3; Swamila, M.17; Welp, H. M.18; William, L.19; Yustas, Y. M.8
通讯作者Graef, F.
来源期刊OUTLOOK ON AGRICULTURE
ISSN0030-7270
EISSN2043-6866
出版年2015
卷号44期号:3页码:179-186
英文摘要

Food security is one of the main goals of rural poor people. To enhance food security in this context, participatory action research can help to ensure sustained success while considering entire food value chains (FVC). This paper assesses the feasibility and potential success of upgrading strategies (UPS) as well as their assessment criteria as developed by German and Tanzanian agricultural scientists. The results form part of a larger participatory research project conducted in two climatically representative regions of Tanzania: semi-arid Dodoma and subhumid Morogoro. This paper presents the findings with respect to food processing, waste management and bioenergy, along with income generation and market participation. Assessments on other components of the FVC, including natural resource management, crop production and consumption, are reported by Graef et al (2015). The assessments for food processing revealed preferences for preservation techniques, oil extraction processes and food storage devices for the semi-arid region. In contrast, in the subhumid region, the experts favoured food storage devices and preservation techniques. Assessments of waste management and bioenergy UPS for both regions indicated the importance of animal feed from crop residues, crop residues as mulch and compost from food waste, although with somewhat different priorities. Assessments on income generation and markets in both regions revealed preferences for savings and credit cooperatives and communication techniques, but also indicated that warehouse receipt systems and guarantee systems had a high impact. Assessments differed between the two different climatic regions, and to some extent also between the nationality of experts and their gender. The authors therefore attach importance to integrating different South-North and female-male awareness in assessments among scientists. Moreover, local and/or regional stakeholders and experts should be involved in developing site-adapted UPS for enhancing FVCs.


英文关键词ex ante impact assessment food security food value chain waste bioenergy income generation
类型Article
语种英语
国家Germany ; Tanzania ; USA
收录类别SCI-E
WOS记录号WOS:000365585400002
WOS关键词CLIMATE-CHANGE ; CROP RESIDUES ; FRAMEWORK ; SECURITY ; FUTURE
WOS类目Agriculture, Multidisciplinary
WOS研究方向Agriculture
资源类型期刊论文
条目标识符http://119.78.100.177/qdio/handle/2XILL650/189452
作者单位1.Leibniz Ctr Agr Landscape Res ZALF eV, Inst Land Use Syst, D-15374 Muncheberg, Germany;
2.ZALF, Inst Land Use Syst, Muncheberg, Germany;
3.ZALF, Inst Socioecon, Muncheberg, Germany;
4.Leibniz Univ Hannover, Inst Environm Econ & World Trade, Hannover, Germany;
5.Univ Hohenheim, Inst Plant Prod & Agroecol Trop & Subtrop, Stuttgart, Germany;
6.Humboldt Univ, Seminar Landliche Entwicklung, D-10099 Berlin, Germany;
7.Tanzania Federat Cooperat, Dar Es Salaam, Tanzania;
8.Sokoine Univ Agr, Dept Agr Engn & Land Planning, Morogoro, Tanzania;
9.Univ Hohenheim, Inst Biol Chem & Nutr, Stuttgart, Germany;
10.Agr Res Inst ARI Ilonga, Kilosa Morogoro, Tanzania;
11.Sokoine Univ Agr, Dept Anim Sci & Prod, Morogoro, Tanzania;
12.ARI Hombolo, Dodoma, Tanzania;
13.Sokoine Univ Agr, Dept Agr Econ & Agribusiness, Morogoro, Tanzania;
14.Univ Dodoma UDOM, Dodoma, Tanzania;
15.Int Food Policy Res Inst, Washington, DC 20036 USA;
16.ZALF, Inst Landscape Hydrol, Muncheberg, Germany;
17.World Agroforestry Ctr ICRAF, ICRAF Tanzania Country Programme, Dar Es Salaam, Tanzania;
18.Univ Sustainable Dev, Fac Forest & Environm, Eberswalde, Germany;
19.Agr Council Tanzania, Dar Es Salaam, Tanzania
推荐引用方式
GB/T 7714
Graef, F.,Schneider, I.,Fasse, A.,et al. Assessment of upgrading strategies to improve regional food systems in Tanzania Food processing, waste management and bioenergy, and income generation[J],2015,44(3):179-186.
APA Graef, F..,Schneider, I..,Fasse, A..,Germer, J. U..,Gevorgyan, E..,...&Yustas, Y. M..(2015).Assessment of upgrading strategies to improve regional food systems in Tanzania Food processing, waste management and bioenergy, and income generation.OUTLOOK ON AGRICULTURE,44(3),179-186.
MLA Graef, F.,et al."Assessment of upgrading strategies to improve regional food systems in Tanzania Food processing, waste management and bioenergy, and income generation".OUTLOOK ON AGRICULTURE 44.3(2015):179-186.
条目包含的文件
条目无相关文件。
个性服务
推荐该条目
保存到收藏夹
导出为Endnote文件
谷歌学术
谷歌学术中相似的文章
[Graef, F.]的文章
[Schneider, I.]的文章
[Fasse, A.]的文章
百度学术
百度学术中相似的文章
[Graef, F.]的文章
[Schneider, I.]的文章
[Fasse, A.]的文章
必应学术
必应学术中相似的文章
[Graef, F.]的文章
[Schneider, I.]的文章
[Fasse, A.]的文章
相关权益政策
暂无数据
收藏/分享

除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。