Arid
DOI10.1016/j.landurbplan.2014.11.008
Evaluation of three vegetation treatments in bioretention gardens in a semi-arid climate
Houdeshel, C. Dasch1; Hultine, Kevin R.2; Johnson, Nancy Collins3; Porneroy, Christine A.4
通讯作者Houdeshel, C. Dasch
来源期刊LANDSCAPE AND URBAN PLANNING
ISSN0169-2046
EISSN1872-6062
出版年2015
卷号135页码:62-72
英文摘要

Bioretention is a well-established tool to reduce nutrient transport from impervious urban landscapes to sensitive riparian habitat in mesic climates. However, the effectiveness of bioretention is less tested in arid and semi-arid climates. Nutrient retention performance was evaluated in three 10 m(2) bioretention cells with different vegetation communities: (I) an irrigated wetland vegetation community, (2) an un-irrigated upland vegetation community, and (3) a no-vegetation control. Synthetic stormwater was added to each cell to simulate the average annual runoff of precipitation from a 220 m(2) impervious surface in Salt Lake City, UT. A significant amount of phosphate (approximate to 50%) was retained by all treatments during the 12-month study. However, total nitrogen (TN) retention was only achieved in the Wetland and Upland treatments (59% and 22%, respectively), and nitrate retention was only achieved in the Wetland treatment (38%). In contrast, the Upland and Control treatments exported 2 and 9 times more nitrate than was added in the simulated rainfall events. Improved nitrogen retention by the Wetland treatment came at the cost of over 12,000I (3200 gal) of irrigation to sustain the vegetation through the hot, dry summer. We hypothesize that plant uptake and soil microbial communities are driving nutrient retention in bioretention systems, and that increasing net primary production will increase nutrient retention. In water-limited climates, this can be sustainably achieved by either: increasing native upland vegetation densities above naturally expected densities, or, by using gray water instead of municipal water sources to irrigate wetland communities through dry summer periods. (C) 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.


英文关键词Bioretention Green infrastructure Low impact development Arid climates Stormwater Nutrient treatment
类型Article
语种英语
国家USA
收录类别SCI-E ; SSCI
WOS记录号WOS:000348554700006
WOS关键词URBAN STORMWATER RUNOFF ; COLORADO RIVER ; BIOFILTRATION SYSTEMS ; RIPARIAN VEGETATION ; POLLUTANT REMOVAL ; NITROGEN REMOVAL ; PERFORMANCE ; NUTRIENT ; SCALE ; OPTIMIZATION
WOS类目Ecology ; Environmental Studies ; Geography ; Geography, Physical ; Regional & Urban Planning ; Urban Studies
WOS研究方向Environmental Sciences & Ecology ; Geography ; Physical Geography ; Public Administration ; Urban Studies
资源类型期刊论文
条目标识符http://119.78.100.177/qdio/handle/2XILL650/189112
作者单位1.Utah State Univ, Ctr Ecol, Logan, UT 84322 USA;
2.Desert Bot Garden, Dept Res Conservat & Collect, Phoenix, AZ 85008 USA;
3.No Arizona Univ, Sch Earth Sci & Environm Sustainabil, Flagstaff, AZ 86011 USA;
4.Univ Utah, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, Salt Lake City, UT USA
推荐引用方式
GB/T 7714
Houdeshel, C. Dasch,Hultine, Kevin R.,Johnson, Nancy Collins,et al. Evaluation of three vegetation treatments in bioretention gardens in a semi-arid climate[J],2015,135:62-72.
APA Houdeshel, C. Dasch,Hultine, Kevin R.,Johnson, Nancy Collins,&Porneroy, Christine A..(2015).Evaluation of three vegetation treatments in bioretention gardens in a semi-arid climate.LANDSCAPE AND URBAN PLANNING,135,62-72.
MLA Houdeshel, C. Dasch,et al."Evaluation of three vegetation treatments in bioretention gardens in a semi-arid climate".LANDSCAPE AND URBAN PLANNING 135(2015):62-72.
条目包含的文件
条目无相关文件。
个性服务
推荐该条目
保存到收藏夹
导出为Endnote文件
谷歌学术
谷歌学术中相似的文章
[Houdeshel, C. Dasch]的文章
[Hultine, Kevin R.]的文章
[Johnson, Nancy Collins]的文章
百度学术
百度学术中相似的文章
[Houdeshel, C. Dasch]的文章
[Hultine, Kevin R.]的文章
[Johnson, Nancy Collins]的文章
必应学术
必应学术中相似的文章
[Houdeshel, C. Dasch]的文章
[Hultine, Kevin R.]的文章
[Johnson, Nancy Collins]的文章
相关权益政策
暂无数据
收藏/分享

除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。