Arid
DOI10.1007/s00192-015-2717-6
Kielland’s forceps: does it increase the risk of anal sphincter injuries? An observational study
Gauthaman, Nivedita1; Henry, Denise1; Ster, Irina Chis2; Khunda, Azar3; Doumouchtsis, Stergios K.1
通讯作者Gauthaman, Nivedita
来源期刊INTERNATIONAL UROGYNECOLOGY JOURNAL
ISSN0937-3462
EISSN1433-3023
出版年2015
卷号26期号:10页码:1525-1532
英文摘要

Rotational instrumental deliveries are thought to carry additional risks compared with non-rotational instrumental deliveries, including trauma to maternal tissues, and require specific expertise and training. We conducted a retrospective study to investigate the association between the type of forceps delivery and maternal perineal trauma, and in particular to investigate if Kielland’s rotational forceps delivery increases obstetric anal sphincter injuries (OASIS).


This is a retrospective observational study of 1,515 women who attended a tertiary maternity unit over a period of 5 years and had operative vaginal deliveries primarily or completed by forceps. Data were obtained through the hospital’s maternity reporting system. The severity of maternal perineal trauma, particularly third and fourth-degree tears in relation to the type of forceps delivery was explored. Multinomial logistic regression models were used to estimate the crude and the adjusted relative risks (RR) of sustaining third-degree tears compared with other types of vaginal tears. Univariate analyses explored the crude associations between relative risks and age, ethnicity, birth weight, type of instrumental delivery and operator’s experience. A multivariate multinomial logistic regression model estimated the adjusted relative risks and included all the previous variables as independent covariates.


Of the 1,492 women included in the study, 150 women (77 %) had sustained category 1 tears, 63 women (4 %) had sustained category 2 tears and 279 women (19 %) had sustained third-degree tears. There was no statistically significant association between the severity of maternal perineal trauma and the type of forceps delivery (failed ventouse vs Kielland’s forceps RR 1.52, p = 0.159 CI 0.84-2.72, Wrigleys vs Kielland’s RR 0.59, p = 0.249, CI 0.24-1.43; Andersons vs Kielland’s RR 1.16, p = 0.603, CI 0.65-2.05) after adjusting for age, birth weight, BMI, ethnicity and operator experience (full list of covariates not included).


The incidence of third- and fourth-degree tears following rotational Kielland’s forceps delivery and other non-rotational forceps deliveries is comparable.


英文关键词Kielland’s forceps Rotational forceps delivery Third-degree tears
类型Article
语种英语
国家England
收录类别SCI-E
WOS记录号WOS:000361638900018
WOS关键词ROTATIONAL FORCEPS ; NEONATAL MORBIDITY ; KJELLANDS FORCEPS ; VAGINAL DELIVERY ; TRENDS ; OUTCOMES ; VACUUM
WOS类目Obstetrics & Gynecology ; Urology & Nephrology
WOS研究方向Obstetrics & Gynecology ; Urology & Nephrology
资源类型期刊论文
条目标识符http://119.78.100.177/qdio/handle/2XILL650/188083
作者单位1.St Georges Univ, Hosp NHS Fdn Trust, Dept Obstet & Gynaecol, London, England;
2.St Georges Univ London, Dept Clin Sci, Biostat, London, England;
3.Guys & St Thomas NHS Fdn Trust, Dept Obstet & Gynaecol, London, England
推荐引用方式
GB/T 7714
Gauthaman, Nivedita,Henry, Denise,Ster, Irina Chis,等. Kielland’s forceps: does it increase the risk of anal sphincter injuries? An observational study[J],2015,26(10):1525-1532.
APA Gauthaman, Nivedita,Henry, Denise,Ster, Irina Chis,Khunda, Azar,&Doumouchtsis, Stergios K..(2015).Kielland’s forceps: does it increase the risk of anal sphincter injuries? An observational study.INTERNATIONAL UROGYNECOLOGY JOURNAL,26(10),1525-1532.
MLA Gauthaman, Nivedita,et al."Kielland’s forceps: does it increase the risk of anal sphincter injuries? An observational study".INTERNATIONAL UROGYNECOLOGY JOURNAL 26.10(2015):1525-1532.
条目包含的文件
条目无相关文件。
个性服务
推荐该条目
保存到收藏夹
导出为Endnote文件
谷歌学术
谷歌学术中相似的文章
[Gauthaman, Nivedita]的文章
[Henry, Denise]的文章
[Ster, Irina Chis]的文章
百度学术
百度学术中相似的文章
[Gauthaman, Nivedita]的文章
[Henry, Denise]的文章
[Ster, Irina Chis]的文章
必应学术
必应学术中相似的文章
[Gauthaman, Nivedita]的文章
[Henry, Denise]的文章
[Ster, Irina Chis]的文章
相关权益政策
暂无数据
收藏/分享

除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。