Arid
DOI10.1016/j.agwat.2014.07.023
Evaluating acceptability of groundwater protection measures under different agricultural policies
Giordano, Raffaele1; D’Agostino, Daniela2; Apollonio, Ciro3; Scardigno, Alessandra2; Pagano, Alessandro1; Portoghese, Ivan1; Lamaddalena, Nicola2; Piccinni, Alberto F.3; Vurro, Michele1
通讯作者D’Agostino, Daniela
来源期刊AGRICULTURAL WATER MANAGEMENT
ISSN0378-3774
EISSN1873-2283
出版年2015
卷号147页码:54-66
英文摘要

Water resources management is often characterized by conflicts in many arid and semi-arid regions, where agriculture is the main user of groundwater (GW). Conflicts could arise among different decision-makers and stakeholders. Moreover, different policies can interact each other hampering or facilitating their implementation and effectiveness. This contribution describes a new implementation of GeSAP, an integrated modelling tool for enabling local GW management by combining the need for GW protection with socio-economic and behavioural determinants of GW use. GeSAP is based on the involvement of multiple stakeholders and the use of Bayesian Belief Networks (BBN) to simulate and explore their attitude relative to GW exploitation and their responses to the introduction of new protection and agricultural policies. In this work, GeSAP was implemented in the area of the Capitanata Irrigation Users Organization, located in the Apulia region (southern Italy). It was used to simulate the reactions of the main stakeholders involved in GW protection policy implementation and to assess the policy’s effectiveness in terms of actual reduction of GW exploitation. Furthermore, the interactions between the GW protection policy and the coming reform of the Common Agricultural Policy (CAP) was investigated. The results of the application proved the capability of the GeSAP tool to assess the actual effectiveness of GW protection policy by investigating how far this policy could be considered acceptable by farmers. In addition, this study demonstrates how the effectiveness of the GW protection policy could be affected by the interaction with the CAP reform. The latter could strongly impact the balance between water demand and availability with the effect of nullifying the positive synergy between CAP and GW protection policy. Although water management issues are not explicitly mentioned among the main scopes of the CAP, this work clearly demonstrates the impact that such policy could have on farmers’ decisions on water use. (C) 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.


英文关键词Groundwater protection policy CAP reform Policies interaction Conflict assessment Bayesian belief network
类型Article
语种英语
国家Italy
收录类别SCI-E
WOS记录号WOS:000344436500006
WOS关键词BAYESIAN NETWORKS ; CONFLICT-ANALYSIS ; MANAGEMENT ; VULNERABILITY ; GOVERNANCE ; RESOURCES ; APULIA ; BASIN ; TOOL
WOS类目Agronomy ; Water Resources
WOS研究方向Agriculture ; Water Resources
资源类型期刊论文
条目标识符http://119.78.100.177/qdio/handle/2XILL650/185588
作者单位1.CNR, Water Res Inst, I-70123 Bari, Italy;
2.CIHEAM, Mediterranean Agron Inst Bari, Valenzano, BA, Italy;
3.Politecn Bari, DICATECh, I-70125 Bari, Italy
推荐引用方式
GB/T 7714
Giordano, Raffaele,D’Agostino, Daniela,Apollonio, Ciro,et al. Evaluating acceptability of groundwater protection measures under different agricultural policies[J],2015,147:54-66.
APA Giordano, Raffaele.,D’Agostino, Daniela.,Apollonio, Ciro.,Scardigno, Alessandra.,Pagano, Alessandro.,...&Vurro, Michele.(2015).Evaluating acceptability of groundwater protection measures under different agricultural policies.AGRICULTURAL WATER MANAGEMENT,147,54-66.
MLA Giordano, Raffaele,et al."Evaluating acceptability of groundwater protection measures under different agricultural policies".AGRICULTURAL WATER MANAGEMENT 147(2015):54-66.
条目包含的文件
条目无相关文件。
个性服务
推荐该条目
保存到收藏夹
导出为Endnote文件
谷歌学术
谷歌学术中相似的文章
[Giordano, Raffaele]的文章
[D’Agostino, Daniela]的文章
[Apollonio, Ciro]的文章
百度学术
百度学术中相似的文章
[Giordano, Raffaele]的文章
[D’Agostino, Daniela]的文章
[Apollonio, Ciro]的文章
必应学术
必应学术中相似的文章
[Giordano, Raffaele]的文章
[D’Agostino, Daniela]的文章
[Apollonio, Ciro]的文章
相关权益政策
暂无数据
收藏/分享

除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。