Arid
DOI10.1007/s10841-014-9723-8
To enrich or not to enrich? Are there any benefits of using multiple colors of pan traps when sampling aculeate Hymenoptera?
Heneberg, Petr1; Bogusch, Petr2
通讯作者Heneberg, Petr
来源期刊JOURNAL OF INSECT CONSERVATION
ISSN1366-638X
EISSN1572-9753
出版年2014
卷号18期号:6页码:1123-1136
英文摘要

The decline of Aculeata has raised concerns regarding their conservation and the maintenance of their function as important pollinators. Pan trapping is among the most frequently used methods for monitoring these organisms. Numerous researchers have suggested using pan traps of multiple colors in addition to the yellow traps. Here we provide the first data for the color preferences of European Aculeata by analyzing 5,421 individuals from 356 species of bees and wasps obtained using white, yellow, turquoise and pink pan traps. The total capture rates and diversity were higher in the white and yellow traps over the turquoise and pink ones. The species-specific abundance did not follow changes in the total capture rates. Nevertheless, only seven (of the 96 most commonly captured species) were captured at low rates in the yellow traps, but were obtained at high rates in the white traps. Only two species (Apis mellifera and Priocnemis minuta) were captured preferentially to other than white or yellow traps. Importantly, caution is needed when assessing the sex ratios of Aculeata obtained by pan trapping because many Aculeata display sex-specific color preferences. For example, in Dasypoda hirtipes, we captured 14 of 16 males in the yellow traps, but obtained 34 of 38 females in the turquoise traps. We provide experimental evidence that the females of numerous oligolectic bees (collecting pollen for their brood on a few specific plant species) display more stringent trap color preferences than their males, which correlates with their observed flower color preferences.


英文关键词Color preferences Ecosystem services Insect diversity Insect pollinators Invertebrate surveys Moericke traps Trap bias Yellow pan traps
类型Article
语种英语
国家Czech Republic
收录类别SCI-E
WOS记录号WOS:000345769600011
WOS关键词FLOWER VISITING INSECTS ; BEES HYMENOPTERA ; PREFERENCES ; APIFORMES ; POLLINATORS ; BUMBLEBEES ; DIVERSITY ; HABITAT ; CHOICES ; DESERT
WOS类目Biodiversity Conservation ; Entomology
WOS研究方向Biodiversity & Conservation ; Entomology
资源类型期刊论文
条目标识符http://119.78.100.177/qdio/handle/2XILL650/183497
作者单位1.Charles Univ Prague, Fac Med 3, Prague 10000, Czech Republic;
2.Univ Hradec Kralove, Fac Sci, Hradec Kralove 50003, Czech Republic
推荐引用方式
GB/T 7714
Heneberg, Petr,Bogusch, Petr. To enrich or not to enrich? Are there any benefits of using multiple colors of pan traps when sampling aculeate Hymenoptera?[J],2014,18(6):1123-1136.
APA Heneberg, Petr,&Bogusch, Petr.(2014).To enrich or not to enrich? Are there any benefits of using multiple colors of pan traps when sampling aculeate Hymenoptera?.JOURNAL OF INSECT CONSERVATION,18(6),1123-1136.
MLA Heneberg, Petr,et al."To enrich or not to enrich? Are there any benefits of using multiple colors of pan traps when sampling aculeate Hymenoptera?".JOURNAL OF INSECT CONSERVATION 18.6(2014):1123-1136.
条目包含的文件
条目无相关文件。
个性服务
推荐该条目
保存到收藏夹
导出为Endnote文件
谷歌学术
谷歌学术中相似的文章
[Heneberg, Petr]的文章
[Bogusch, Petr]的文章
百度学术
百度学术中相似的文章
[Heneberg, Petr]的文章
[Bogusch, Petr]的文章
必应学术
必应学术中相似的文章
[Heneberg, Petr]的文章
[Bogusch, Petr]的文章
相关权益政策
暂无数据
收藏/分享

除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。