Knowledge Resource Center for Ecological Environment in Arid Area
DOI | 10.1111/ddi.12181 |
Does pyrodiversity beget alpha, beta or gamma diversity? A case study using reptiles from semi-arid Australia | |
Farnsworth, Lisa M.1; Nimmo, Dale G.2,3; Kelly, Luke T.2,3,4; Bennett, Andrew F.2,3; Clarke, Michael F.1 | |
通讯作者 | Nimmo, Dale G. |
来源期刊 | DIVERSITY AND DISTRIBUTIONS
![]() |
ISSN | 1366-9516 |
EISSN | 1472-4642 |
出版年 | 2014 |
卷号 | 20期号:6页码:663-673 |
英文摘要 | Aim A common assumption in fire ecology and management is that landscapes with a greater diversity of fire-ages will support a greater diversity of animal species (i.e. ’pyrodiversity begets biodiversity’). This assumption is based on the idea that landscapes with a more diverse fire history provide a greater array of post-fire habitats, leading to a greater number of species within the landscape. We assessed the hypothesis that pyrodiversity begets biodiversity by enhancing community differentiation (beta diversity), resulting in increased landscape-scale richness (gamma-diversity). We used reptiles as a case-study. Location The Mallee region of south-eastern Australia. Methods We used a study design in which ’whole’ fire mosaics (12.6km(2)) were the unit of replication. Study landscapes (n=28) were selected to represent a gradient in the diversity and extent of fire-age classes. We surveyed reptiles by using pitfall traps at 10 sites within each landscape (280 sites in total). Reptile data were used to characterize reptile assemblages at the landscape-scale in three ways: alpha (average within-site diversity), beta (between-site diversity) and gamma diversity (total diversity). Results The diversity of fire-age classes had little influence on the alpha, beta or gamma diversity of reptile assemblages. The properties of fire mosaics that most influenced assemblages were the extent of structurally important fire-age classes. The extent of long-unburned vegetation increased beta diversity but reduced alpha diversity of the total reptile assemblage, essentially cancelling each other out at the landscape scale. Main conclusions This study highlights the importance of considering multiple measures of diversity when exploring the influence of landscape properties on biodiversity, as ’null’ results at the landscape scale (gamma diversity) can result from contrasting patterns in alpha and beta diversity. Using fire to create habitat mosaics, at the scale of this study, is unlikely to enhance the status of reptiles in the region. |
英文关键词 | patch-mosaic burning beta-diversity pyrodiversity semi-arid fire management reptiles Fire ecology |
类型 | Article |
语种 | 英语 |
国家 | Australia |
收录类别 | SCI-E |
WOS记录号 | WOS:000334893900005 |
WOS关键词 | BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION ; FIRE MOSAICS ; HABITAT ; ASSEMBLAGES ; MANAGEMENT ; RESPONSES ; GRADIENT ; WILDFIRE ; ECOLOGY ; LIZARDS |
WOS类目 | Biodiversity Conservation ; Ecology |
WOS研究方向 | Biodiversity & Conservation ; Environmental Sciences & Ecology |
资源类型 | 期刊论文 |
条目标识符 | http://119.78.100.177/qdio/handle/2XILL650/181568 |
作者单位 | 1.La Trobe Univ, Dept Zool, Bundoora, Vic 3086, Australia; 2.Deakin Univ, Landscape Ecol Res Grp, Burwood, Vic 3125, Australia; 3.Deakin Univ, Ctr Integrat Ecol, Burwood, Vic 3125, Australia; 4.Univ Melbourne, ARC Ctr Excellence Environm Decis, Parkville, Vic 3010, Australia |
推荐引用方式 GB/T 7714 | Farnsworth, Lisa M.,Nimmo, Dale G.,Kelly, Luke T.,et al. Does pyrodiversity beget alpha, beta or gamma diversity? A case study using reptiles from semi-arid Australia[J],2014,20(6):663-673. |
APA | Farnsworth, Lisa M.,Nimmo, Dale G.,Kelly, Luke T.,Bennett, Andrew F.,&Clarke, Michael F..(2014).Does pyrodiversity beget alpha, beta or gamma diversity? A case study using reptiles from semi-arid Australia.DIVERSITY AND DISTRIBUTIONS,20(6),663-673. |
MLA | Farnsworth, Lisa M.,et al."Does pyrodiversity beget alpha, beta or gamma diversity? A case study using reptiles from semi-arid Australia".DIVERSITY AND DISTRIBUTIONS 20.6(2014):663-673. |
条目包含的文件 | 条目无相关文件。 |
除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。