Arid
DOI10.1016/j.ecoinf.2010.10.001
Cross-fence comparisons: Theory for spatially comprehensive, controlled variable assessment of treatment effects in managed landscapes
Kilpatrick, Adam D.1,2; Warren-Smith, Stephen C.3; Read, John L.1,2; Lewis, Megan M.1; Ostendorf, Bertram1
通讯作者Kilpatrick, Adam D.
来源期刊ECOLOGICAL INFORMATICS
ISSN1574-9541
出版年2011
卷号6期号:2页码:170-176
英文摘要

Historically monitoring of grazing impacts in rangelands has been seriously compromised by the small area, infrequency and variability of field-based sampling plots. Remote sensing of vegetation cover, which can be a surrogate for overall ecosystem condition, permits adequate spatial and temporal monitoring of land condition but can still be compromised by considerable inter and intra-paddock (field) variability. Cross-fence sample pairs control for local dines and patchiness in spatial and temporal variables such as vegetation, landform, soil type, surface-flows, and rainfall. We describe the theory behind a novel monitoring methodology that utilizes cross-fence sample pairs to rank paddocks, whether adjacent or not, using a system of linear equations and field based or preferably remotely-sensed data. This methodology outputs a condition ranking for each paddock in the system, with the aforementioned spatial and temporal variables controlled. Within paddock variability, such as differential grazing distribution, can be readily incorporated as weighting factors when suitable models are developed. This methodology may also be applicable to other grazing, agricultural and natural systems and applications where land management units have distinguishable boundaries. (C) 2010 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.


英文关键词Cross-fence comparisons Rangelands Remote-sensing GIS Monitoring
类型Article
语种英语
国家Australia
收录类别SCI-E
WOS记录号WOS:000288727800010
WOS关键词PERENNIAL GRASS RECOVERY ; EARLY WARNING INDICATORS ; ARID RANGELANDS ; LIVESTOCK REMOVAL ; VEGETATION COVER ; LAND DEGRADATION ; CATTLE ; AUSTRALIA ; PATTERNS ; DESERTIFICATION
WOS类目Ecology
WOS研究方向Environmental Sciences & Ecology
资源类型期刊论文
条目标识符http://119.78.100.177/qdio/handle/2XILL650/167819
作者单位1.Univ Adelaide, Sch Earth & Environm Sci, Adelaide, SA 5005, Australia;
2.Arid Recovery, Roxby Downs, SA 5725, Australia;
3.Univ Adelaide, Inst Photon & Adv Sensing, Adelaide, SA 5005, Australia
推荐引用方式
GB/T 7714
Kilpatrick, Adam D.,Warren-Smith, Stephen C.,Read, John L.,et al. Cross-fence comparisons: Theory for spatially comprehensive, controlled variable assessment of treatment effects in managed landscapes[J],2011,6(2):170-176.
APA Kilpatrick, Adam D.,Warren-Smith, Stephen C.,Read, John L.,Lewis, Megan M.,&Ostendorf, Bertram.(2011).Cross-fence comparisons: Theory for spatially comprehensive, controlled variable assessment of treatment effects in managed landscapes.ECOLOGICAL INFORMATICS,6(2),170-176.
MLA Kilpatrick, Adam D.,et al."Cross-fence comparisons: Theory for spatially comprehensive, controlled variable assessment of treatment effects in managed landscapes".ECOLOGICAL INFORMATICS 6.2(2011):170-176.
条目包含的文件
条目无相关文件。
个性服务
推荐该条目
保存到收藏夹
导出为Endnote文件
谷歌学术
谷歌学术中相似的文章
[Kilpatrick, Adam D.]的文章
[Warren-Smith, Stephen C.]的文章
[Read, John L.]的文章
百度学术
百度学术中相似的文章
[Kilpatrick, Adam D.]的文章
[Warren-Smith, Stephen C.]的文章
[Read, John L.]的文章
必应学术
必应学术中相似的文章
[Kilpatrick, Adam D.]的文章
[Warren-Smith, Stephen C.]的文章
[Read, John L.]的文章
相关权益政策
暂无数据
收藏/分享

除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。