Knowledge Resource Center for Ecological Environment in Arid Area
DOI | 10.1016/j.ecoinf.2010.10.001 |
Cross-fence comparisons: Theory for spatially comprehensive, controlled variable assessment of treatment effects in managed landscapes | |
Kilpatrick, Adam D.1,2; Warren-Smith, Stephen C.3; Read, John L.1,2; Lewis, Megan M.1; Ostendorf, Bertram1 | |
通讯作者 | Kilpatrick, Adam D. |
来源期刊 | ECOLOGICAL INFORMATICS
![]() |
ISSN | 1574-9541 |
出版年 | 2011 |
卷号 | 6期号:2页码:170-176 |
英文摘要 | Historically monitoring of grazing impacts in rangelands has been seriously compromised by the small area, infrequency and variability of field-based sampling plots. Remote sensing of vegetation cover, which can be a surrogate for overall ecosystem condition, permits adequate spatial and temporal monitoring of land condition but can still be compromised by considerable inter and intra-paddock (field) variability. Cross-fence sample pairs control for local dines and patchiness in spatial and temporal variables such as vegetation, landform, soil type, surface-flows, and rainfall. We describe the theory behind a novel monitoring methodology that utilizes cross-fence sample pairs to rank paddocks, whether adjacent or not, using a system of linear equations and field based or preferably remotely-sensed data. This methodology outputs a condition ranking for each paddock in the system, with the aforementioned spatial and temporal variables controlled. Within paddock variability, such as differential grazing distribution, can be readily incorporated as weighting factors when suitable models are developed. This methodology may also be applicable to other grazing, agricultural and natural systems and applications where land management units have distinguishable boundaries. (C) 2010 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. |
英文关键词 | Cross-fence comparisons Rangelands Remote-sensing GIS Monitoring |
类型 | Article |
语种 | 英语 |
国家 | Australia |
收录类别 | SCI-E |
WOS记录号 | WOS:000288727800010 |
WOS关键词 | PERENNIAL GRASS RECOVERY ; EARLY WARNING INDICATORS ; ARID RANGELANDS ; LIVESTOCK REMOVAL ; VEGETATION COVER ; LAND DEGRADATION ; CATTLE ; AUSTRALIA ; PATTERNS ; DESERTIFICATION |
WOS类目 | Ecology |
WOS研究方向 | Environmental Sciences & Ecology |
资源类型 | 期刊论文 |
条目标识符 | http://119.78.100.177/qdio/handle/2XILL650/167819 |
作者单位 | 1.Univ Adelaide, Sch Earth & Environm Sci, Adelaide, SA 5005, Australia; 2.Arid Recovery, Roxby Downs, SA 5725, Australia; 3.Univ Adelaide, Inst Photon & Adv Sensing, Adelaide, SA 5005, Australia |
推荐引用方式 GB/T 7714 | Kilpatrick, Adam D.,Warren-Smith, Stephen C.,Read, John L.,et al. Cross-fence comparisons: Theory for spatially comprehensive, controlled variable assessment of treatment effects in managed landscapes[J],2011,6(2):170-176. |
APA | Kilpatrick, Adam D.,Warren-Smith, Stephen C.,Read, John L.,Lewis, Megan M.,&Ostendorf, Bertram.(2011).Cross-fence comparisons: Theory for spatially comprehensive, controlled variable assessment of treatment effects in managed landscapes.ECOLOGICAL INFORMATICS,6(2),170-176. |
MLA | Kilpatrick, Adam D.,et al."Cross-fence comparisons: Theory for spatially comprehensive, controlled variable assessment of treatment effects in managed landscapes".ECOLOGICAL INFORMATICS 6.2(2011):170-176. |
条目包含的文件 | 条目无相关文件。 |
除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。