Arid
DOI10.1071/RJ07048
The ’viability’ and resilience of communities and settlements in desert Australia
Smith, Mark Stafford1,2; Moran, Mark2,3; Seemann, Kurt2,4
通讯作者Smith, Mark Stafford
来源期刊RANGELAND JOURNAL
ISSN1036-9872
出版年2008
卷号30期号:1页码:123-135
英文摘要

There is a continuing policy debate about whether it is possible to have sustainable small settlements in outback regions of Australia, where there is low and variable primary production and a sparse and mobile population. This debate is focused largely on Aboriginal settlements, but applies equally to all desert dwellers. In this contribution, we review the sources of economic flows through settlements occupied by different communities with common livelihood sources, whether based on mining, grazing, tourism, cultural resources, welfare or services, concluding that most desert livelihoods depend directly or indirectly on temporally variable inputs. Individual remote settlements tend to be dominated by one such ’community of livelihood’, and differ in nature according to the source of that livelihood. These create types of settlement and service aspirations which are alien to more densely settled regions.


Settlement ’viability’ is a measure of the short-term balance between aspirations for services (technical, social, but also for livelihoods and well being) and the costs of fulfilling these aspirations, and consequently is not a simple on/off switch - the community can adjust both its aspirations and the cost factors involved in meeting them. We define a resilient settlement as one that is viable in the long term in the face of its variable inputs. Thus, we determine that the concepts of settlement viability and resilience must be analysed differently according to the strategy adopted by different resident communities. In particular, Aboriginal (and pastoral) communities are particularly dependent on social and natural capital, yet these are not monitored. The whole analysis emphasises the importance of taking a demand-rather than supply-driven approach to services in desert settlements. Our conclusion is that, if top-down solutions continue to be imposed without appreciating the fundamental drivers of settlement in desert regions, then those solutions will continue to be partial, and ineffective in the long term.


英文关键词desert Australia Indigenous futures policy service delivery sustainable livelihoods
类型Article
语种英语
国家Australia
收录类别SCI-E ; SSCI
WOS记录号WOS:000254550200012
WOS关键词TRANSITION
WOS类目Ecology
WOS研究方向Environmental Sciences & Ecology
来源机构Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation
资源类型期刊论文
条目标识符http://119.78.100.177/qdio/handle/2XILL650/159006
作者单位1.CSIRO, Sustainable Ecosyst, Canberra, ACT 2601, Australia;
2.Desert Knowledge CRC, Alice Springs, NT 0871, Australia;
3.Ctr Appropriate Technol, Alice Springs, NT 0871, Australia;
4.So Cross Univ, Coffs Harbour, NSW 2457, Australia
推荐引用方式
GB/T 7714
Smith, Mark Stafford,Moran, Mark,Seemann, Kurt. The ’viability’ and resilience of communities and settlements in desert Australia[J]. Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation,2008,30(1):123-135.
APA Smith, Mark Stafford,Moran, Mark,&Seemann, Kurt.(2008).The ’viability’ and resilience of communities and settlements in desert Australia.RANGELAND JOURNAL,30(1),123-135.
MLA Smith, Mark Stafford,et al."The ’viability’ and resilience of communities and settlements in desert Australia".RANGELAND JOURNAL 30.1(2008):123-135.
条目包含的文件
条目无相关文件。
个性服务
推荐该条目
保存到收藏夹
导出为Endnote文件
谷歌学术
谷歌学术中相似的文章
[Smith, Mark Stafford]的文章
[Moran, Mark]的文章
[Seemann, Kurt]的文章
百度学术
百度学术中相似的文章
[Smith, Mark Stafford]的文章
[Moran, Mark]的文章
[Seemann, Kurt]的文章
必应学术
必应学术中相似的文章
[Smith, Mark Stafford]的文章
[Moran, Mark]的文章
[Seemann, Kurt]的文章
相关权益政策
暂无数据
收藏/分享

除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。