Knowledge Resource Center for Ecological Environment in Arid Area
DOI | 10.1029/2006JG000318 |
Comparing different methods for assessing ground truth of rover data analysis for the 2005 season of the Life in the Atacama Project | |
Thomas, G. W.; Peate, I. Ukstins; Nakamoto, J.; Pudenz, E.; Glasgow, J.; Bretthauer, J.; Cabrol, N.; Wettergreen, D.; Grin, E.; Coppin, P.; Dohm, J. M.; Piatek, J. L.; Warren-Rhodes, K.; Hock, A. N.; Weinstein, S.; Fisher, G.; Diaz, G. Chong; Cockell, C. S.; Marinangeli, L.; Minkley, N.; Moersch, J.; Ori, G. G.; Smith, T.; Stubb, K.; Wagner, M.; Waggoner, A. S. | |
通讯作者 | Thomas, G. W. |
来源期刊 | JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-BIOGEOSCIENCES
![]() |
ISSN | 2169-8953 |
EISSN | 2169-8961 |
出版年 | 2007 |
卷号 | 112期号:G4 |
英文摘要 | The scientific success of a remote exploration rover mission depends on the right combination of technology, teamwork and scientific insight. In order to quantitatively evaluate the success of a rover field trial, it is necessary to assess the accuracy of scientific interpretations made during the field test. This work compares three structured approaches to assessing the ground truth of scientific findings from a science team conducting a remote investigation of a locale using an autonomous rover. For the first approach, independent assessment, the daily science summaries were analyzed and reduced to a series of 1082 factual statements, which were treated as hypotheses. An independent scientist traveled to the field area to assess these hypotheses. For the second approach, guided self-study, the mission scientists themselves traveled to the field area and evaluated their own scientific interpretations. The third approach, discrepancy investigation, searched for the root causes of differences between the scientific interpretations made in the control room and those made in the field. The independent investigation provided sensitive, quantitative data, but suffered from the lack of context and continuity developed in the mission control room. The guided evaluation benefited from the context of the mission, but lacked clarity and consistency. The discrepancy investigation provided insight into the root causes behind the discrepancies, but was expensive and time consuming. The independent investigation method yielded particularly compelling results, but each method offers advantages and a comprehensive rover field trial assessment should include a combination of all three. |
类型 | Article |
语种 | 英语 |
国家 | USA ; Chile ; England ; Italy |
收录类别 | SCI-E |
WOS记录号 | WOS:000249519100002 |
WOS关键词 | THEMATIC MAPPER DATA ; NORTHWEST-TERRITORIES ; FIELD EXPERIMENT ; MARS ; MISSIONS ; HABITAT ; SCIENCE ; DESERT |
WOS类目 | Environmental Sciences ; Geosciences, Multidisciplinary |
WOS研究方向 | Environmental Sciences & Ecology ; Geology |
来源机构 | University of Arizona ; University of California, Los Angeles |
资源类型 | 期刊论文 |
条目标识符 | http://119.78.100.177/qdio/handle/2XILL650/155061 |
作者单位 | (1)Univ Iowa, Dept Mech & Ind Engn, Iowa City, IA 52242 USA;(2)NASA, Ames Res Ctr, Moffett Field, CA 94035 USA;(3)SETI Inst, Mountain View, CA USA;(4)Carnegie Mellon Univ, Inst Robot, Pittsburgh, PA 15213 USA;(5)Univ Arizona, Dept Hydrol & Water Resources, Tucson, AZ 85721 USA;(6)Univ Tennessee, Dept Earth & Planetary Sci, Knoxville, TN 37996 USA;(7)Univ Calif Los Angeles, Dept Earth & Space Sci, Los Angeles, CA 90095 USA;(8)Carnegie Mellon Univ, Mol Biosensor & Imaging Ctr, Pittsburgh, PA 15213 USA;(9)Univ Catholica Norte, Antofagasta, Chile;(10)British Antarctic Survey, Cambridge CB3 0ET, England;(11)IRSPS, I-65127 Pescara, Italy |
推荐引用方式 GB/T 7714 | Thomas, G. W.,Peate, I. Ukstins,Nakamoto, J.,et al. Comparing different methods for assessing ground truth of rover data analysis for the 2005 season of the Life in the Atacama Project[J]. University of Arizona, University of California, Los Angeles,2007,112(G4). |
APA | Thomas, G. W..,Peate, I. Ukstins.,Nakamoto, J..,Pudenz, E..,Glasgow, J..,...&Waggoner, A. S..(2007).Comparing different methods for assessing ground truth of rover data analysis for the 2005 season of the Life in the Atacama Project.JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-BIOGEOSCIENCES,112(G4). |
MLA | Thomas, G. W.,et al."Comparing different methods for assessing ground truth of rover data analysis for the 2005 season of the Life in the Atacama Project".JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-BIOGEOSCIENCES 112.G4(2007). |
条目包含的文件 | 条目无相关文件。 |
除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。