Knowledge Resource Center for Ecological Environment in Arid Area
DOI | 10.2307/4002680 |
Semi-arid warm-season grass yield and nutritive value in Argentina | |
Stritzler, NP; Pagella, JH; Jouve, VV; Ferri, CM | |
来源期刊 | JOURNAL OF RANGE MANAGEMENT
![]() |
ISSN | 0022-409X |
出版年 | 1996 |
卷号 | 49期号:2页码:121-125 |
英文摘要 | The use of standing dead biomass, during the winter that was produced by warm-season grasses in the previous growing season by pregnant beef cows may be an alternative to grazing systems in the semi-arid Pampean Region of Argentina, This study, conducted over 2 years, 1990 and 1991, compared the winter forage quality produced during the previous growing season for 4 warm-season grasses; switchgrass (Panicum virgatum L. cv. Pathfinder), kleingrass (Panicum coloratum L.), tetrachne (Tetrachne dregei Nees) and weeping lovegrass (Eragrostis curvula (Schrad), Nees cv. Tanganyka), Five harvests of the summer growth started after the first frost, and were spaced evenly throughout the winter period, Changes in the standing crop of dry matter were measured and subsamples of forage were divided into leaf and stem fractions, Forage quality analyses included: crude protein (CP), in vitro dry matter digestibility (IVDMD), effective rumen degradability (ED), neutral (NDF) and acid (ADF) detergent fiber and lignin, Tetrachne dregei produced forage with a higher leaf:stem ratio and of generally higher quality, than the other species, although the differences were not always significant, Its CP content was marginally below the maintenance requirements of cows, Dry matter yield of tetrachne was lower than that of weeping lovegrass, but differences were only significant in 1990, Kleingrass generally was high in quality and dry matter yield, although it was the lowest in percentage of leaves of the 4 species evaluated, Switchgrass was the least productive; the nutritive value of its forage was low, comparable or lower than that of weeping lovegrass, The first harvest date was higher in nutritive value, Although the nutritive value of leaves and stems were not compared statistically, the leaves tended to be higher than the stems, Tetrachne dregei, the best of the species evaluated in this study, is a very promising warm-season grass, which could provide nutritious forage for winter grazing systems in the semiarid Pampean Region of Argentina. |
英文关键词 | warm-season grasses yield forage quality semiarid environment Argentina |
类型 | Article |
语种 | 英语 |
国家 | ARGENTINA |
收录类别 | SCI-E |
WOS记录号 | WOS:A1996UA01800006 |
WOS关键词 | SWITCHGRASS ; DIGESTIBILITY ; DEGRADATION ; BLUESTEM ; QUALITY ; LIGNIN ; STEMS |
WOS类目 | Agriculture, Dairy & Animal Science ; Ecology |
WOS研究方向 | Agriculture ; Environmental Sciences & Ecology |
资源类型 | 期刊论文 |
条目标识符 | http://119.78.100.177/qdio/handle/2XILL650/133173 |
作者单位 | (1)UNIV NACL LA PAMPA,RA-6300 SANTA ROSA,LA PAMPA,ARGENTINA;(2)INST NACL TECNOL AGROPECUARIA,ANGUIL,LA PAMPA,ARGENTINA |
推荐引用方式 GB/T 7714 | Stritzler, NP,Pagella, JH,Jouve, VV,et al. Semi-arid warm-season grass yield and nutritive value in Argentina[J],1996,49(2):121-125. |
APA | Stritzler, NP,Pagella, JH,Jouve, VV,&Ferri, CM.(1996).Semi-arid warm-season grass yield and nutritive value in Argentina.JOURNAL OF RANGE MANAGEMENT,49(2),121-125. |
MLA | Stritzler, NP,et al."Semi-arid warm-season grass yield and nutritive value in Argentina".JOURNAL OF RANGE MANAGEMENT 49.2(1996):121-125. |
条目包含的文件 | 条目无相关文件。 |
除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。